Article Sidebar

Download
Download PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 4 Download : 8

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Industrialisasi berbasis hilirisasi nikel telah mendorong munculnya pusat pertumbuhan ekonomi baru di Indonesia, salah satunya melalui Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park (IMIP) di Kabupaten Morowali, Sulawesi Tengah. Dalam kurun waktu 2011–2025, PDRB Kabupaten Morowali meningkat dari sekitar Rp4,25 triliun menjadi lebih dari Rp188 triliun, menjadikan kawasan ini salah satu pusat industrialisasi nikel terbesar di dunia. Meskipun berhasil menciptakan pertumbuhan ekonomi dan investasi dalam skala besar, percepatan industrialisasi memunculkan tekanan signifikan terhadap sistem perkotaan dan pembangunan kawasan penyangga, khususnya Kecamatan Bahodopi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis tantangan penataan kawasan di sekitar IMIP dan merumuskan model pengembangan yang mendukung keberlanjutan jangka panjang. Desain penelitian menggunakan studi kasus tunggal dengan pendekatan analisis multi-skala yang mencakup tingkat makro, meso, dan mikro. Data diperoleh melalui observasi lapangan sistematis, wawancara mendalam, serial focus group discussion, analisis spasial berbasis citra satelit, dan telaah dokumen perencanaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Bahodopi telah berkembang melampaui fungsi tradisionalnya sebagai kawasan industri dan menunjukkan karakteristik kota industri baru (industrial city), namun dengan kesenjangan pembangunan kawasan (industrial urbanization gap) yang signifikan pada dimensi infrastruktur, pelayanan publik, dan tata kelola lingkungan. Penelitian ini mengusulkan The Bahodopi Industrial City Framework yang mengintegrasikan prinsip compact city, green industrial city, dan resilient city melalui kerangka perencanaan multi-skala. Kontribusi teoritis utama mencakup pengembangan empat konsep: Industrial Growth Pole–Industrial City Transition, Industrial Urbanization Gap, Integrated Industrial City Framework, dan Multi-Scale Industrial Planning Framework. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa keberhasilan hilirisasi ditentukan bukan hanya oleh pertumbuhan ekonomi, tetapi juga oleh kemampuan kawasan dalam mengelola transformasi ruang, lingkungan, dan masyarakat secara berkelanjutan.

Keywords

hilirisasi nikel kota industri urbanisasi industri pusat pertumbuhan perencanaan multi-skala compact city pembangunan kawasan berkelanjutan Bahodopi Morowali

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright © Bappenas Working Papers

How to Cite
Muhyiddin, M., Nugroho, H., Pardede, T., & Mendatu, A. (2026). Strategi Penataan Kawasan Bahodopi sebagai Pengembangan Pusat Pertumbuhan Baru: Pendekatan Multi-Skala Berbasis Compact City, Green Industrial City, dan Resilient City. Bappenas Working Papers, 9(3), 171 - 190. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v9i3.603

References

  1. Alongi, D. M. (2002). Present state and future of the world's mangrove forests. Environmental Conservation, 29(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000231
  2. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
  3. Auty, R. M. (2001). The political economy of resource-driven growth. European Economic Review, 45(4–6), 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00126-X
  4. Bappenas. (2023). Dokumen master plan pengembangan dan penataan sekitar kawasan industri, Kabupaten Morowali 2023. Bappenas.
  5. Bridge, G. (2008). Global production networks and the extractive sector: Governing resource-based development. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 389–419. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn009
  6. Cervero, R. (1998). The transit metropolis: A global inquiry. Island Press.
  7. Chan, F. K. S., Griffiths, J. A., Higgitt, D., Xu, S., Zhu, F., Tang, Y. T., Xu, Y., & Thorne, C. R. (2018). "Sponge city" in China—A breakthrough of planning and flood risk management in the urban context. Land Use Policy, 76, 772–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  9. Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D., & Porter, L. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
  10. European Environment Agency. (2006). Urban sprawl in Europe: The ignored challenge (EEA Report No. 10/2006). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2800/11250
  11. Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press.
  12. Firman, T. (2009). The continuity and change in mega-urbanization in Indonesia: A survey of Jakarta–Bandung Region (JBR) development. Habitat International, 33(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.08.005
  13. Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton University Press.
  14. Gibbs, D., & Deutz, P. (2007). Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(17), 1683–1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.003
  15. Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4(3), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
  16. Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge.
  17. Hess, M., & Yeung, H. W. C. (2006). Whither global production networks in economic geography? Environment and Planning A, 38(7), 1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38463
  18. Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press.
  19. Hoyle, B. (2000). Global and local change on the port-city waterfront. Geographical Review, 90(3), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2000.tb00344.x
  20. International Energy Agency. (2023). The role of critical minerals in clean energy transitions. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions
  21. Jenkins, R. (2013). One thing leads to another: Promoting industrialisation by making the most of the commodity boom in Sub-Saharan Africa. The European Journal of Development Research, 25(5), 847–848. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2013.32
  22. Jenks, M., & Burgess, R. (Eds.). (2000). Compact cities: Sustainable urban forms for developing countries. Spon Press.
  23. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
  24. Lowe, E. A. (2001). Eco-industrial park handbook for Asian developing countries. Indigo Development; Environment Department, Asian Development Bank.
  25. Muhyiddin, Mendatu, A., Amrizal, M. D. R., & Wahyuningrat, J. (2026). Dapatkah hilirisasi mineral mendorong transformasi ekonomi daerah? Bukti dari Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park. Bappenas Working Papers, IX(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v9i2.559
  26. Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and under-developed regions. Duckworth.
  27. Neuman, M. (2005). The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04270466
  28. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
  29. Perroux, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de pôle de croissance. Économie Appliquée, 8, 307–320.
  30. Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. Macmillan.
  31. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
  32. Rasiah, R. (2011). Is Malaysia facing premature deindustrialization? Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 16(3), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2011.589570
  33. Richardson, H. W. (1978). Regional and urban economics. Penguin Books.
  34. Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2015). The nature of cities: The scope and limits of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12134
  35. Turok, I., & McGranahan, G. (2013). Urbanization and economic growth: The arguments and evidence for Africa and Asia. Environment and Urbanization, 25(2), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813490908
  36. UN-Habitat. (2020). World cities report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/World%20Cities%20Report%202020
  37. Williams, K., Burton, E., & Jenks, M. (Eds.). (2000). Achieving sustainable urban form. Spon Press.
  38. World Bank. (2023). Indonesia economic prospects: Harnessing the power of critical minerals. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/indonesia/publication/indonesia-economic-prospects
  39. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  40. Zeng, D. Z. (2015). Global experiences with special economic zones: Focus on China and Africa (Policy Research Working Paper No. 7240). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7240

Most read articles by the same author(s)