Article Sidebar

Download
Download PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 11 Download : 5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Perencanaan pembangunan inklusif telah muncul sebagai paradigma transformatif dalam kebijakan publik kontemporer, yang didorong oleh keharusan global dalam rangka operasionalisasi mandat "leaving no one behind". Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengatasi fragmentasi dalam literatur akademis dengan menyintesis interaksi dinamis antara prasyarat tata kelola (governance) dan hasil kesejahteraan nyata bagi populasi yang termarginalkan. Dengan menerapkan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) yang didasarkan pada protokol PRISMA dan analisis Publish or Perish (PoP), penelitian ini pada awalnya mengidentifikasi 2.081 dokumen dalam basis data Scopus. Setelah mengeliminasi 705 dokumen yang terduplikasi, sebanyak 1.376 dokumen disaring kemabali sehingga menghasilkan 52 paper yang memenuhi syarat. Selanjutnya terdapat 31 Artikel/ Paper terpilih berdasarkan kriteria kekuatan informasi (information power). Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembangunan inklusif secara intrinsik terikat pada konteks, yang berkembang melalui tiga trajektori utama yaitu transisi dari pendekatan berbasis pertumbuhan (growth-centricity) menuju kesejahteraan bio-psikososial, integrasi keadilan ekologis di era Anteseden, dan inklusi relasional untuk memitigasi asimetri kekuasaan yang telah mengakar. Lebih lanjut, analisis ini mengidentifikasi adanya kesenjangan implementasi (implementation gap) yang meluas, di mana asimetri birokrasi dan tokenisme prosedural berupa partisipasi simbolis menghambat keterlibatan masyarakat secara substantif. Kerangka kerja integratif yang dihasilkan menunjukkan bahwa agensi individu dan dukungan organisasi hanya dapat ditransformasikan menjadi konsekuensi kinerja apabila dimediasi oleh keterlekatan sosial (social embeddedness) dan dimoderasi oleh literasi digital. Secara teoretis, penelitian ini mengonseptualisasikan ekosistem perencanaan partisipatif yang holistik, sementara secara praktis merekomendasikan transisi radikal dari keterlibatan simbolis menuju pembagian kekuasaan yang substantif (substantive power-sharing) untuk memastikan pembangunan wilayah yang tangguh dan berkeadilan.

Keywords

Anteseden konsekuensi pembangunan inklusif pembagian kekuasaan PRISMA

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright © Bappenas Working Papers

How to Cite
Muzaqi, A. H., Ma’ruf, M. F., & Wahyuningrat, J. (2026). Dinamika Perencanaan Pembangunan Inklusif: Tinjauan Sistematis Berbasis Pendekatan PRISMA. Bappenas Working Papers, 9(3), 285 - 306. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v9i3.613

References

  1. Abers, R. N., Oliveira, M. S. de, & Pereira, A. K. (2017). Inclusive development and the asymmetric state: big projects and local communities in the Brazilian Amazon. The Journal of Development Studies, 53(6), 857–872.
  2. Acharya, K. K., & Zafarullah, H. (2024). Whither demarginalization, inclusion and effectiveness? Challenges of local government planning in Nepal. Millennial Asia, 15(2), 216–235.
  3. Ahmad, I., & Islam, M. R. (2024). Empowerment and participation: Key strategies for inclusive development. In Building strong communities: Ethical approaches to inclusive development (pp. 47–68). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  4. Arifin, S. R. M. (2018). Ethical considerations in qualitative study. International Journal of Care Scholars, 1(2), 30–33.
  5. Asibey, M. O., Agyei, F., Okrah, M. N., & Blija, D. K. (2026). The politics of urban climate adaptation: informality, institutional action, and resilience in Ghana’s cities. Cities, 172, 106832.
  6. Asongu, S. A., Le Roux, S., & Biekpe, N. (2017). Environmental degradation, ICT and inclusive development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Policy, 111, 353–361.
  7. Bellato, L., & Cheer, J. M. (2021). Inclusive and regenerative urban tourism: Capacity development perspectives. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 7(4), 943–961.
  8. Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14.
  9. Chu, E., Anguelovski, I., & Roberts, D. (2017). Climate adaptation as strategic urbanism: assessing opportunities and uncertainties for equity and inclusive development in cities. Cities, 60, 378–387.
  10. Cooper, H. (2015). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (Vol. 2). Sage publications.
  11. Diprose, R., Savirani, A., Setiawan, K. M. P., & Francis, N. (2020). Women’s collective action and the village law: How women are driving change and shaping pathways for gender-inclusive development in rural Indonesia. The Australia-Indonesia partnership for gender equality and women’s ….
  12. Dywili, S., & Draai, E. (2019). Citizen engagement to foster inclusive development planning in local governance. Administratio Publica, 27(3), 256–273.
  13. Ekins, P., Gupta, J., & Boileau, P. (2019). Global environment outlook–GEO-6: Healthy planet, healthy people.
  14. Ernawati, E., Tajuddin, T., & Nur, S. (2021). Does government expenditure affect regional inclusive growth? An experience of implementing village fund policy in Indonesia. Economies, 9(4), 164.
  15. Feagin, J. R., Orum, A. M., & Sjoberg, G. (2016). A case for the case study. UNC Press Books.
  16. Fernando, N. A. (2008). Rural development outcomes and drivers: An overview and some lessons.
  17. Fon, N. N. A., Achu, N. N., & Formella, C. N. (2024). Whose right is right? The dialectics of remedial secession and territorial sovereignty in the Cameroon Anglophone crisis. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 30(3), 399–419.
  18. Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences. Pergamon Press.
  19. Gammelgaard, B. (2017). The qualitative case study. In The International Journal of Logistics Management (Vol. 28, Number 4, pp. 910–913). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  20. Gupta, J., & Bavinck, M. (2017). Reprint of “Inclusive development and coastal adaptiveness.” Ocean & Coastal Management, 150, 73–81.
  21. Gupta, J., Bavinck, M., Ros-Tonen, M., Asubonteng, K., Bosch, H., van Ewijk, E., Hordijk, M., Van Leynseele, Y., Cardozo, M. L., & Miedema, E. (2021). COVID-19, poverty and inclusive development. World Development, 145, 105527.
  22. Gupta, J., Pouw, N. R. M., & Ros-Tonen, M. A. F. (2015). Towards an elaborated theory of inclusive development. The European Journal of Development Research, 27(4), 541–559.
  23. Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 433–448.
  24. Hickey, S. (2013). Thinking about the politics of inclusive development: Towards a relational approach.
  25. Hutter, G. (2007). Strategic planning for long-term flood risk management: Some suggestions for learning how to make strategy at regional and local level. International Planning Studies, 12(3), 273–289.
  26. Jones, P., & Comfort, D. (2020). A commentary on the United Kingdom’s leading food retailers’ resilience plans in the face of climate change. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(2), e2047.
  27. Katyaini, S., Wessel, M. van, & Sahoo, S. (2021). Representation by development organizations: Evidence from India and implications for inclusive development. The Journal of Environment & Development, 30(1), 98–123.
  28. Keep, M., Montanari, B., & Greenlee, A. J. (2021). Contesting “inclusive” development: Reactions to slum resettlement as social inclusion in Tamesna, Morocco. Cities, 118, 103328.
  29. Kooy, M., Walter, C. T., & Prabaharyaka, I. (2018). Inclusive development of urban water services in Jakarta: The role of groundwater. Habitat International, 73, 109–118.
  30. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and Quantity, 38(6), 787–800.
  31. Lee, J., Babcock, J., Pham, T. S., Bui, T. H., & Kang, M. (2023). Smart city as a social transition towards inclusive development through technology: A tale of four smart cities. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(sup1), 75–100.
  32. Liu, W., Yang, J., Gong, Y., & Cheng, Q. (2022). An evaluation of urban renewal based on inclusive development theory: The case of Wuhan, China. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(11), 563.
  33. Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760.
  34. Matamanda, A. R., & Chinozvina, Q. L. (2020). Driving forces of citizen participation in urban development practice in Harare, Zimbabwe. Land Use Policy, 99, 105090.
  35. Moyo, T., & Mamobolo, M. (2014). The national development plan (NDP): A comparative analysis with the reconstruction and development programme (RDP), the growth, employment and redistribution (GEAR) programme and the accelerated and shared-growth initiative (ASGISA). Journal of Public Administration, 49(3), 946–959.
  36. Mudzakkir, M. F., Sukoco, B. M., & Suwignjo, P. (2022). World-class universities: past and future. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(3), 277–295.
  37. Murthi, N. W., Utama, M. S., Saskara, I. A. N., & Marhaeni, A. (2022). The effect of several factors on inclusive growth in the coastal village–Badung. Central European Management Journal, 30(4), 1371–1383.
  38. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469.
  39. Paez, A. (2017). Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine, 10(3), 233–240.
  40. Popova, O. (2020). Inclusive development: a new concept or an update of the sustainable development concept? Economy and Forecasting, (1), 112–123.
  41. Pouw, N., & Gupta, J. (2017). Inclusive development: a multi-disciplinary approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 104–108.
  42. Pouw, N. R. M., & De Bruijne, A. (2015). Strategic governance for inclusive development. The European Journal of Development Research, 27(4), 481–487.
  43. Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110.
  44. Putra, I. K., Sukoco, B. M., & Wu, W.-Y. (2025). Landscape and opportunity of rural entrepreneurship: systematic literature review. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 122.
  45. Rauniyar, G., & Kanbur, R. (2010). Inclusive growth and inclusive development: A review and synthesis of Asian Development Bank literature. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 15(4), 455–469.
  46. Reinders, S., Dekker, M., van Kesteren, F., & Oudenhuijsen, L. (2019). Inclusive development in Africa. Synthesis Report Series of INCLUDE, the Knowledge Platform on Inclusive Development Policies, 1–60.
  47. Roberts, K., Dowell, A., & Nie, J.-B. (2019). Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 1–8.
  48. Sachs, I. (2004). Inclusive development and decent work for all. Int’l Lab. Rev., 143, 161.
  49. Saks, M. (2023). The evolution of the medical and health professions in the National Health Services. In National Health Services of Western Europe (pp. 242–265). Routledge.
  50. Sha, K., Taeihagh, A., & De Jong, M. (2024). Governing disruptive technologies for inclusive development in cities: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 203, 123382.
  51. Sibanda, M. M., & Lues, L. (2021). Public participation power dynamics in strategic development planning in a metropolitan municipality: Eastern Cape Province. Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation, 2, 44.
  52. Singh, R. P. B., & Kumar, S. (2020). Holy-Heritage city development and planning in India: A study of Ayodhya. In Urban and regional planning and development: 20th Century Forms and 21st Century Transformations (pp. 515–535). Springer.
  53. Sutherland, C., Scott, D., & Hordijk, M. (2015). Urban water governance for more inclusive development: A reflection on the ‘waterscapes’ of Durban, South Africa. The European Journal of Development Research, 27(4), 488–504.
  54. Tenny, S., Brannan, J. M., Brannan, G. D., & Sharts-Hopko, N. (2020). Qualitative Study StatPearls Publishing. Published.
  55. Triyanti, A., Bavinck, M., Gupta, J., & Marfai, M. A. (2017). Social capital, interactive governance and coastal protection: The effectiveness of mangrove ecosystem-based strategies in promoting inclusive development in Demak, Indonesia. Ocean & Coastal Management, 150, 3–11.
  56. Widianingsih, I., & Paskarina, C. (2019). Defining Inclusiveness in Development: Perspective from Local Governmentâ€TM s Apparatus. Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(2), 137–147.

Most read articles by the same author(s)