Article Sidebar

Download
Download PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 77 Download : 30

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Riset sains dasar memerankan peran strategis dalam mendukung inovasi dan peningkatan produktivitas nasional menuju transformasi ekonomi berbasis pengetahuan. Studi ini mengidentifikasi arah kebijakan dan strategi penguatan riset sains dasar di Indonesia dengan mengadopsi pendekatan systematic literature review (SLR) terhadap sejumlah publikasi ilmiah dan laporan kebijakan dari tahun 2004 hingga 2024. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kontribusi riset sains dasar di Indonesia masih terbatas akibat rendahnya anggaran penelitian, jumlah peneliti yang minim, serta lemahnya kolaborasi antara pemerintah, perguruan tinggi, dan industri. Hal ini ditandai dengan pengeluaran R&D Indonesia yang masih rendah (0,28% dari PDB) dan jumlah peneliti per satu juta penduduk (395) yang berdampak pada skor Global Innovation Index yang rendah (29,3) pada tahun 2020. Indonesia dapat melakukan benchmarking terhadap negara lain seperti China, Prancis, dan Paraguay yang berhasil mengoptimalkan riset sains dasar melalui peningkatan pendanaan, skema insentif yang adaptif, serta penguatan ekosistem riset kolaboratif. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, studi ini merekomendasikan lima arah kebijakan utama: peningkatan alokasi anggaran, skema insentif bagi sektor swasta dan akademik, penguatan SDM riset sains dasar, pengembangan kolaborasi lintas sektor, dan reformasi kelembagaan riset. Rekomendasi ini diharapkan dapat menjadi fondasi kebijakan dalam mendukung pencapaian Visi Indonesia Emas 2045 melalui sains dasar yang kuat dan produktif.

Keywords

riset sains dasar inovasi produktivitas

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright ©Kementerian PPN/Bappenas RI

How to Cite
Rusdi, S. N. H., Yasir Arafat, Astri Kusuma Mayasari, Agustino Zulys, & Iwan Pranoto. (2026). Optimalisasi Riset Sains Dasar untuk Peningkatan Inovasi dan Produktivitas . Bappenas Working Papers, 9(2), 338-355. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v9i2.455

References

  1. Adigunarso, A., et al. (2022). Pengaruh R&D intensity terhadap produktivitas dan inovasi: Studi lintas negara. Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen, 20(2).
  2. Akcigit, U., Hanley, D., & Serrano-Velarde, N. (2020). Back to basics: Basic research spillovers, innovation policy and growth.
  3. Bappenas. (2024). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Nasional (RPJPN) 2025–2045. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas RI. https://indonesia2045.go.id/aspirasi
  4. Bappenas. (2025). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2025–2029. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas RI. https://rpjmn.bappenas.go.id/dokumen
  5. Bate, A. F., Wachira, E. W., & Danka, S. (2023). The determinants of innovation performance: An income-based cross-country comparative analysis using the Global Innovation Index (GII). Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6590777.v1
  6. Cabrera et al. (2023) The Steps to Doing a Systems Literature Review (SLR) Journal of Systems Thinking. (23) 3.
  7. Coccia, M., & Roshani, S. (2024). Research funding and citations in papers of Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine, 2019–2020. Journal of Data and Information Science, 9(2), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0006
  8. Donna, M. L. G., León, M. L. C., Colas, C. G., Gunsett, A. P., Maniero, S. F., Osuna, D. O., et al. (2023). Breaking the unvirtuous cycle: Barriers and opportunities for research and development in Paraguay. A case study. Frontiers in Medicine, 10, 1266246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1266246
  9. Dobrovolska, O., Sonntag, R., Masiuk, Y., Bahorka, M., & Yurchenko, N. (2023). Is increasing a share of R&D expenditure in GDP a factor in strengthening the level of innovation development in Ukraine compared with GII’s top countries? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(4), 713–723. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.53
  10. Frontier Economics. (2023). Rate of return to investment in R&D: A report for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology.
  11. Gersbach, H., Schetter, U., & Schmassmann, S. (2023). From local to global: A theory of public basic research in a globalized world.
  12. Hamidah, H., et al. (2025). Interpretive structural model to enhance research productivity in Indonesia based on the science and technology index. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology.
  13. INSEAD. (2023). Global Talent Competitiveness Index (GTCI) 2023. https://www.insead.edu/gtci
  14. Jaffe K, Caicedo M, Manzanares M, Gil M, Rios A, et al. (2013) Productivity in Physical and Chemical Science Predicts the Future Economic Growth of Developing Countries Better than Other Popular Indices. PLoS ONE 8(6): e66239. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066239
  15. Jiang, Y., Xu, B., Fang, L., Sun, B., Hu, L., et al. (2022). Basic research investment, innovation capability improvement, and economic growth efficiency. PLOS ONE, 17(12), e0278943. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278943
  16. Kelland, L. (2007). The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nature Reviews Cancer, 7(8), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2167
  17. Khan, F. (2023). R&D expenditures and economic growth: A panel data analysis for selected developing economies.
  18. Kompas. (2025a). Melompat Jadi Negara Maju melalui Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi yang Berdampak. Kompas edisi 2 Mei 2025. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/diktisaintek-berdampak-berikan-solusi-nyata-ke-masyarakat
  19. Kompas. (2025b). Perebutan Supremasi Sains dan Teknologi. Kompas edisi 3 Juni 2025. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/perebutan-supremasi-sains-dan-teknologi
  20. Kompas. (2025c). Riset Diarahkan untuk Kebutuhan Industri. Kompas edisi 1 Agustus 2025. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/harmonisasikan-perguruan-tinggi-dan-industri-untuk-dukung-kemajuan
  21. Marchiori, C., & Minelli, E. (2023). Talent, basic research and growth. Journal of Economic Theory.
  22. McMorrow, K., & Röger, W. (2009). R&D capital and economic growth: The empirical evidence. EIB Papers, 14(1), 94–118.
  23. Negassi, S., & Sattin, J.-F. (2019). Evaluation of public R&D policy: A meta-regression analysis.
  24. OECD. (2023). OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2023: Enabling transitions in times of disruption. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0b55736e-en
  25. Porter, M. E. On Competition. Updated and Expanded Ed. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2008.
  26. Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2004). The Knowledge Economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037
  27. Rimnac, C. M., & Leopold, S. S. (2014). Editorial: Basic science, applied science, and product testing.
  28. Rosenberg, B., Van Camp, L., & Krigas, T. (1965). Inhibition of Cell Division in Escherichia coli by Electrolysis Products from a Platinum Electrode. Nature, 205(4972), 698–699. https://doi.org/10.1038/205698a0
  29. Laverde-Rojas, H., Correa, J.C. Can scientific productivity impact the economic complexity of countries?. Scientometrics 120, 267–282 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03118-8
  30. Sofrankova, B., Kiselakova, D., Cabinova, V., & Onuferova, E. (2018). The importance of research and development spending in the context of global competitiveness and the innovation potential of the V4 countries. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business and Economics, 2018, Article ID 916196. https://doi.org/10.5171/2018.916196
  31. NY Times. (2014). Xi Urges Greater Innovation in ‘Core Technologies’. https://archive.nytimes.com/
  32. sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/10/xi-urges-greater-innovation-in-core-technologies/. Diakses pada 27 Mei 2025.
  33. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2023). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP). http://data.uis.unesco.org/ (Accessed: 25 February 2025)
  34. Wen, K., Zhang, N., Li, Z., & You, D. (2023). Accelerating efforts to improve policy system to support basic research in enterprises. Bulletin of Chinese A Sciences, 38(4), Article 9.
  35. Wheate, N. J., Walker, S., Craig, G. E., & Oun, R. (2010). The status of platinum anticancer drugs in the clinic and in clinical trials. Dalton Transactions, 39(35), 8113–8127. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0DT00292E
  36. World Bank. (2020). The promise of education in Indonesia. World Bank.
  37. World Bank. (2021). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) – China. World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (Accessed: 25 February 2025)
  38. Wong, S. T. C. (2014). On translating technology research into industrial applications.
  39. Xiao, F., & Wang, J. (2023). For future investment: Empirical study on enterprise participant in basic research in the process of digital transformation.
  40. Zhou, Y., & Dahal, S. (2024). Has R&D contributed to productivity growth in China? The role of basic, applied and experimental R&D.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'