Article Sidebar

Download
Download PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 241 Download : 404

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Indonesia berkomitmen untuk melaksanakan pembangunan berkelanjutan khususnya di bidang sosial dan ekonomi dengan memperhatikan kualitas lingkungan hidup dan didukung oleh kapasitas fiskal yang memadai. Hubungan antara variabel-variabel yang mempengaruhi kualitas lingkungan provinsi di Indonesia dibahas dengan metode estimasi Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) berkaitan dengan hubungan variabel penelitian dengan lingkungan hidup. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa Environmental Kuznet Curve (EKC) terjadi dalam model kualitas lingkungan hidup dan kualitas udara. Pembangunan manusia, kemiskinan, belanja fungsi lingkungan dan industri manufaktur berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kualitas lingkungan. Persentase PAD, transfer fiskal dan urbanisasi berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kualitas lingkungan hidup. Pemerintah perlu menerapkan PDRB Hijau, menyiapkan perangkat kebijakan pelayanan terbaik, meningkatkan regulasi dan penegakan hukum, menerapkan sistem transfer fiskal berbasis ekologi, meningkatkan kualitas belanja fungsi lingkungan dan mempertahankan kebijakan bauran energi nasional.

Keywords

pembangunan berkelanjutan kualitas lingkungan hidup pembangunan ekonomi-sosial desentralisasi fiskal

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright ©Kementerian PPN/Bappenas RI

How to Cite
Prasetianto, A., & Kustiwan, I. (2023). Pengaruh Pembangunan Ekonomi-Sosial dan Desentralisasi Fiskal Terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia. Bappenas Working Papers, 6(3), 274 - 298. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v6i3.222

References

  1. Baltagi, B. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. Dalam Vasa.
  2. Bano, S., Zhao, Y., Ahmad, A., Wang, S., & Liu, Y. (2018). Identifying the impacts of human capital on carbon emissions in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.008
  3. Budi Suharto, R., Rochaida, E., Roy, J., & Setini, M. (2020). Connectivity Inclusive Economic Development And Environmental Quality In Decentralized Indonesia. Dalam Connectivity Inclusive Economic Development And Environmental Quality In Decentralized Indonesia-Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology (Vol. 17, Nomor 6).
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogyakarta: pustaka pelajar.
  5. Droste, N., Lima, G. R., May, P. H., & Ring, I. (2015). Ecological Fiscal Transfers in Brazil – incentivizing or compensating conservation? Paper presented at the 11th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE).
  6. Duan, Q., & Tan, M. (2019). Spatial and temporal variations of forest cover in developing countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061517
  7. Duraiappah, A. K. (1998). Poverty and environmental degradation: A review and analysis of the Nexus. World Development, 26(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00100-4
  8. Ebert, U., & Welsch, H. (2004). Meaningful environmental indices: A social choice approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2003.09.001
  9. Ferezagia, D. V. (2018). Analisis tingkat kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Terapan, 1(1).
  10. Fiorino, D. J. (2011). Explaining national environmental performance: Approaches, evidence, and implications. Policy Sciences, 44(4), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-011-9140-8
  11. Halimatussadiah, A., Wiko, K., Joko, S., Haryanto, T., Cesarina, A., Abraham, B., Faizal, S., Fachry, M., Afifi, A. R., Al, W., & Anky, K. (t.t.). Jakarta Pusat 10430, DKI Jakarta-Indonesia Telp. (021) 3143 177 Fax (Nomor 021). http://www.lpem.org
  12. Halkos, G. E., & Paizanos, E. A. (2013). The Effect of Government Expenditure on the Environment: An Empirical Investigation. Ecological Economics, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.002
  13. Haris, A. (2015). Studi Media Dan Perpustakaan Tentang Urbanisasi. Jupiter, 14(1).
  14. Ibrahim, R. L., & Ajide, K. B. (2021). The dynamic heterogeneous impacts of nonrenewable energy, trade openness, total natural resource rents, financial development and regulatory quality on environmental quality: Evidence from BRICS economies. Resources Policy, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102251
  15. Ioan, B., Mozi, R. M., Lucian, G., Gheorghe, F., Horia, T., Ioan, B., & Mircea-Iosif, R. (2020). An Empirical Investigation on Determinants of Sustainable Economic Growth. Lessons from Central and Eastern European Countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(7), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13070146
  16. Irmayanti. (2017). Pengaruh Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Kabupaten Polewali Mandar. Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri, 01.
  17. Jamaludin, A. N. (2017). Sosiologi Perkotaan Memahami Masyarakat Kota dan Problematikanya. Dalam Sosiologi Perkotaan (Vol. 2, Nomor 2).
  18. Juhro, S., & Trisnanto, B. (2018). Paradigma Dan Model Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Endogen Indonesia.
  19. Kalbar, P. P., Birkved, M., Kabins, S., & Nygaard, S. E. (2016). Personal Metabolism (PM) coupled with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) model: Danish Case Study. Environment International, 91, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.032
  20. Karaduman, C. (t.t.). The effects of economic globalization and productivity on environmental quality: evidence from newly industrialized countries. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15717-1/Published
  21. Khattak, S. I., Ahmad, M., Khan, Z. U., & Khan, A. (2020). Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07876-4
  22. Kumar, S., & Managi, S. (2009). Compensation for environmental services and intergovernmental fiscal transfers: The case of India. Ecological Economics, 68(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.009
  23. Kurniawan, A. (2019). Pembangunan Ekonomi, Industrialisasi, dan Degradasi Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia Tahun 1967-2013: Enviromental Kuznet Curve Model. Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.24843/jekt.2019.v12.i01.p08
  24. Li, X., & Xu, L. (2021). Human development associated with environmental quality in China. PLoS ONE, 16(2 February). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246677
  25. López, R., Galinato, G. I., & Islam, A. (2011). Fiscal spending and the environment: Theory and empirics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.03.001
  26. Masoud Abouie-Mehrizi,. (2012). The effect of variables population growth, urbanization and economic growth on CO2 Emissions in Iran. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 6(28). https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm11.2020
  27. Maulidiyah, D. R., & Auwalin, I. (2021). PENGARUH PEMBIAYAAN PERBANKAN SYARIAH TERHADAP KUALITAS LINGKUNGAN HIDUP TINGKAT PROVINSI DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.20473/vol8iss20214pp439-450
  28. Mumbunan, S. ;, Ring, I. ;, Lenk, T., Mumbunan, S., & Ring, I. (2012). Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Ecological fiscal transfers at the provincial level in Indonesia Ecological fiscal transfers at the provincial level in Indonesia. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/55837
  29. Wiyekti, N. (2021). Transisi menuju Ekonomi Hijau, Berkaitan dengan Kualitas Lingkungan Era Desentralisasi di Indonesia: Transition to a Green Economy, Relating to Environmental Quality in the Era of Decentralization in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Komputasi dan Statistika, 1(1), 32-39.
  30. Oktavilia, S., Setyadharma, A., Wahyuningrum, I. F. S., & Damayanti, N. (2021). Analysis of government expenditure and environmental quality: An empirical study using provincial data levels in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 623(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/623/1/012071
  31. Manurung, T. (2019). Skema Pembiayaan Konservasi Dan Pelestarian Hutan Melalui Model Transfer Fiskal Berbasis Ekologis Di Indonesia.
  32. Orchidea, M. D., Mulatsih, S., & Purnamadewi, Y. L. (2016). Effectiveness of Deconcentration Budget Policy toward Environmental Quality Improvement. Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, 6(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.19081/jpsl.2016.6.2.200
  33. Poku, F. A. (2016). Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Urbanization and Population: Empirical Evidence in Sub Saharan Africa. Energy Economics Letters, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.82/2016.3.1/82.1.1.16
  34. Pradiptyo, R., Saputra, W., Nugroho, A., & Hutami, A. (2019). Ketika Kekayaan Alam Tidak Menyejahterakan: Pembelajaran dari Pencegahan Korupsi Sektor Sumber Daya Alam. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 5(2).
  35. Rany, A. P., Farhani, S. A., Nurina, V. R., & Primada, L. M. (2020). Tantangan Indonesia Dalam Mewujudkan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Yang Kuat dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan Melalui Indonesia Green Growth Program Oleh Bappenas. JIEP, 20(1).
  36. Ring, I., & Schröter-Schlaack, C. (2011). POLICYMIX ‐ Assessing the role of economic instruments in policy mixes for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision. Instrument Mixes for Biodiversity Policies. Instrument Mixes for Biodiversity Policies. POLICYMIX Report 2/2011, 2.
  37. Sasana, H., & Ghozali, I. (2017). The impact of fossil and renewable energy consumption on the economic growth in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(3).
  38. Sen, K. K., & Abedin, M. T. (2021). A comparative analysis of environmental quality and Kuznets curve between two newly industrialized economies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-04-2020-0083
  39. Setyadharma, A., Oktavilia, S., Nihayah, D. M., Bowo, P. A., & Wahyuningrum, I. F. S. (2020). The trade-off between Poverty and Environmental Degradation: Evidence from Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 448(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/448/1/012065
  40. Shanty, O., Dita, W. P., Firmansyah, & Sugiyanto, F. X. (2018). The Relationship between Environmental Degradation, Poverty and Human Quality in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 73. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187310020
  41. Sittisak, P., & Ekasingh, B. (2015). Trade-offs between the Economic, Social and Environmental Objectives in Optimal Resource Management in the Fang Watershed, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.08.006
  42. STATUS LINGKUNGAN HIDUP INDONESIA 2013 Ketahanan Lingkungan Hidup. (t.t.).
  43. Sumargo, B., Nuriza, F. A., Mulyono, & Rohimah, S. R. (2021). The two-stage least squares simultaneous equation model for panel data on human development, economics, and environmental quality. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2331. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041874
  44. Uchimura, H., & Suzuki, Y. (2009). Measuring Fiscal Decentralization in the Philippines. Discussion Paper No. 209I, 209.
  45. Wiyekti, N., & Mariatul Qibthiyyah, R. (2021). IMPACT INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER ON FOREST CONSERVATION IN INDONESIA. JURNAL MANAJEMEN KEUANGAN PUBLIK, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31092/jmkp.v5i1.1212
  46. Zhang, X., Zhao, Y., Xu, X., & Wang, C. (2017). Urbanization effect on energy-related carbon emissions in Jiangsu province from the perspective of resident consumption. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 26(4), 1875–1884. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/68953
  47. Hidayati, A. Z. (2022). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Indeks Kualitas Lingkungan Hidup (Iklh) Di Indonesia Tahun 2017-2019. Jurnal Medika Hutama, 3(02 Januari), 2327-2340.