Main Article Content

Abstract

Perubahan iklim, pertumbuhan populasi, risiko kesehatan, tren politik, ekonomi, lingkungan, sosial, perkembangan teknologi dan inovasi di bidang pertanian membuat pergeseran dalam upaya produksi dan distribusi bidang pangan dan pertanian. Kondisi ini menuntut adanya investasi teknologi, infrastruktur, penelitian dan pengembangan, dan peningkatan kapabilitas sumber daya manusia (SDM) yang berkelanjutan. Untuk mengatasi hal tersebut, Perguruan Tinggi Vokasi sebagai lembaga pendidikan perlu membangun sinergi bersama dunia usaha, industri, dan dunia kerja (Dudika) agar mampu mencetak SDM yang memiliki keahlian dan kompetensi yang selaras dengan perkembangan zaman. Salah satu upaya adalah melalui pendekatan Teaching Factory, yang dilakukan melalui pengintegrasian kegiatan pendidikan, penelitian, dan inovasi dengan melibatkan peran aktif industri dan akademisi. Praktik baik pelaksanaan Teaching Factory dilakukan oleh Sekolah Vokasi IPB University. Berdasarkan hasil pengamatan, Sekolah Vokasi IPB University telah mengimplementasikan pendekatan Teaching Factory melalui dua mode operasi, yakni "Dudika ke kelas" dan "Kelas ke Dudika". Hal ini memberikan manfaat dan dampak positif bagi Sekolah Vokasi IPB University sebagai lembaga pendidikan, mahasiswa sebagai peserta didik, dan perusahaan-perusahaan mitra.

Keywords

Teaching Factory Pendidikan Tinggi Vokasi Dudika IPB University

Article Details

How to Cite
Brilyanti, F. A. (2022). Sinergi Pendidikan Tinggi Vokasi Pertanian dengan Dudika: Studi Kasus Sekolah Vokasi IPB University. Bappenas Working Papers, 5(3), 290 - 307. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v5i3.105

References

  1. Ankrah, S., & Omar, A. T. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
  2. Asmara, A., & Ming-Chang, W. (2020). An analytical study on the effective approaches to facilitate higher education cooperate with industry: Based on faculty members perspective. TEM Journal, 9(4), 1721. https://doi.org/ 10.18421/TEM94‐53
  3. Bamber, P., Guinn, A., Gereffi, G., & Norbu, T. (2014). Burundi in the coffee global value chain: Skills for private sector development. Duke University: Social Science research Institute
  4. Bikard, M., Vakili, K., & Teodoridis, F. (2018). When Collaboration Bridges Institutions: The Impact of Industry Collaboration on Academic Productivity. Organization Science, 30(2), 426-445. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2883365
  5. Charania, I., & Li, X. (2020). Smart farming: Agriculture's shift from a labor intensive to technology native industry. Internet of Things, 9, 100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100142
  6. Dodds S. H., Hajkowicz S. & Eady S. (2021). ABARES Insights Issue 1. Australian Government. https://doi.org/ 10.25814/5d9165cf4241d
  7. King, C. W. (2021). Energy and Food: The Megatrend of Megatrends. In The Economic Superorganism (pp. 25-57). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50295-9_2
  8. King, T., Cole, M., Farber, J. M., Eisenbrand, G., Zabaras, D., Fox, E. M., & Hill, J. P. (2017). Food safety for food security: Relationship between global megatrends and developments in food safety. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 68, 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.014
  9. Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). The teaching factory paradigm: Developments and outlook. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.029
  10. Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2019). The Teaching Factory Network: A new collaborative paradigm for manufacturing education. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 398-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.062
  11. Mulder, N. D. (2017). Global Meat Industry Outlook: Capturing Business Opportunities In A Fast Changing World. Copenhagen: Rabobank.
  12. Nguyen, G. N., & Sarker, T. (2018). Sustainable coffee supply chain management: a case study in Buon Me Thuot City, Daklak, Vietnam. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(1), 1-17.
  13. OECD/FAO (2021), OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021-2030. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/19428846-en.
  14. Sjöö, K., & Hellström, T. (2019). University–industry collaboration: A literature review and synthesis. Industry and higher education, 33(4), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219829697
  15. Tijssen, R. J., Yegros-Yegros, A., & Winnink, J. J. (2016). University–industry R&D linkage metrics: validity and applicability in world University rankings. Scientometrics, 109(2), 677-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2098-8
  16. Yang, X., Shu, L., Chen, J., Ferrag, M. A., Wu, J., Nurellari, E., & Huang, K. (2020). A survey on smart agriculture: Development modes, technologies, and security and privacy challenges. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 8(2), 273-302. . https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2020.1003536